Legal Opinion

Curtis Studio v. Lennes

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1922No. 17020PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.

This is an action in replevin wherein the respondent is seeking to recover certain photographic negatives, of which it alleges it is the owner and to which it is entitled to possession, and of which the appellant has wrongfully obtained possession. The answer, after general denials, contains two affirmative defenses, the first one being that the question of ownership and right of possession had been determined in an action brought in the superior court of King county by this respondent against this appellant involving the same property, that action being one for an injunction against the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Douthitt v. MacCulskyWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Shoemake v. FinlaysonWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Masterson v. Union Bank & Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Desimone v. SpenceWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  2. State Ex Rel. Bentley v. FrengerWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Howard v. MortensenWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Maryland Casualty Co. v. GatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1923
  5. Woodruff v. CoateWashington Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API