Hedges v. Durrance
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1. Plaintiffs Brenda Hedges and Skip Hoblin appeal a decision of the Washington Superior Court granting summary judgment to defendants on plaintiffs’ claims of attorney negligence. Plaintiffs claim that the court erred in finding that defendants did not owe plaintiff Hedges a duty of care and that plaintiff Hoblin had suffered no injury. We affirm.
¶ 2. This case arises out of defendant-attorney Durrance’s representation of Hoblin. In 1994, Hedges filed for a divorce from Hoblin. Hoblin was represented by defendant Durrance of Gaston, Durrance and Fairbanks, LLP, and Hedges was also…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Pelham v. GriesheimerIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
- White v. Quechee Lakes Landowners' Ass'nSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- Barcelo v. ElliottTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Petrillo v. BachenbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Bowman v. John DoeWashington Supreme Court · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Bloomer v. GibsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
- Webb v. LeClairSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
- Kenneth P. Felis v. Downs Rachlin Martin PLLC, and Gallagher, Flynn & Company, LLPSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- Lay v. Pettengill, NovotnySupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
- Sean Kelly v. The University of Vermont Medical CenterSupreme Court of Vermont · 2022
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.