Lay v. Pettengill, Novotny
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
¶ 1. Plaintiff David M. Lay appeals from the superior court’s order granting summary judgment to defendants William J. Pettengill, Elizabeth F. Novotny, and Daniel K. Troidl on his complaint. Lay’s claims stem from an internal investigation into his behavior as a state trooper and his subsequent resignation from the Vermont State Police (VSP). Lay argues that the superior court erred in granting judgment to defendants on his claims of fraudulent nondisclosure, retaliatory prosecution, malicious prosecution, and negligent referral. He also challenges several discovery rulings made by the…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hartman v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Colon v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Lucinda Darrah v. City of Oak Park, Russell Bragg, a Troy Police OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Robertson v. Mylan Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2004
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- In re Chrysler-Dodge-Jeep Ecodiesel Mktg.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Grega v. PettengillDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2015
- McKinney v. OkoyeNebraska Supreme Court · 2014
- Bergman v. Spruce Peak Realty, LLCDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2012
- Smith v. WrightSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.