Legal Opinion

Petrillo v. Bachenberg

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 29, 1995PublishedCited by 108 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

POLLOCK, J.

The issue is whether under the circumstances of this ease the attorney for the seller of real estate owes a duty to a potential buyer. Plaintiff, Lisa Petrillo, alleges that because of the negligence of defendant Bruce Herrigel, an attorney, she received a misleading copy of a percolation-test report that induced her to sign a contract to purchase property. At the close of plaintiffs case, the Law Division concluded that Herrigel did not owe a duty to plaintiff to provide a complete and accurate report. The Appellate Division reversed, 268…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. H. Rosenblum, Inc. v. AdlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  3. Prudential Insurance v. Dewey, Ballantine, Bushby, Palmer & WoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Century 21 Deep South Prop., Ltd. v. CorsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Bozza v. Vornado, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1964

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by108 opinions

  1. Banco Popular North America v. GandiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  2. McCamish, Martin, Brown & Loeffler v. F.E. Appling InterestsTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  3. LoBiondo v. SchwartzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
  4. Kaufman v. I-Stat Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
  5. Rezem Family Associates, LP v. Borough of MillstoneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011

103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API