National Union Fire Ins. Co. v. Deas
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Justice.
Plaintiff’s house, insured by defendant company, was, on January 30, 1933, totally destroyed by fire. The property was under-two mortgages — the first to the Federal Land Bank, and the second to one Gordon. The policy contained the usual provision that it should be void if any change, other than by death of an insured, should take place in the interest, title, or possession of the subject of insurance (except change of occupants without increase of hazard), whether by legal lirocess or judgment or by voluntary act of the insured, or otherwise.
Among- other defenses interposed,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Continental Ins. Co. of New York v. RotholzSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. AaronSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- North River Insurance v. WaddellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- Capital City Insurance v. Caldwell Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1891
- Williams v. HatchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1862
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- &198tna Ins. Co. v. Baldwin Cty. Bldg. Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- United States Fire Ins. Co. v. HechtSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Jackson v. NATIONAL SEC. FIRE AND CAS. CO.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2006