Legal Opinion

&198tna Ins. Co. v. Baldwin Cty. Bldg. Loan Ass'n

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 17, 1935No. 1 Div. 880PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

This is an action on a policy of fire insurance, tried on an agreed statement of facts, by the court without a jury. The judgment was for plaintiff.

The right to recover is controlled by a single proposition of law. Plaintiff had a mortgage on the property burned, a dwelling house, and the lot on which it was located. The mortgagor paid the premium on the policy issued to her, and had attached to it the New York standard mortgage clause, by which, among other provisions, the loss was payable to plaintiff as mortgagee, as interest may appear, not to be invalidated by any act or…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bank of New Brockton v. DunnavantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. American Equitable Assur. Co. v. Powderly Coal & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  3. Harris v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  4. Allison v. CodySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  5. Aetna Ins. v. HannSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. WilbornSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  2. Northwestern National Insurance Co. v. MildenbergerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
  3. Bailey Mortg. Co. v. Gobble-Fite Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  4. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. WilkesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  5. Milwaukee Mechanics Ins. Co. v. MaplesAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API