In re H.V.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Neill, J.
{¶ 1} In this case, we are asked to decide whether a juvenile court has the authority to commit a delinquent juvenile to the Ohio Department of Youth Services (“ODYS”) for a minimum period in excess of 30 days for violating his supervised release. We must then decide whether a juvenile court, when committing a juvenile to the ODYS for a supervised-release violation, can order that the commitment period be served consecutively to the commitment period imposed for the crime that resulted in the violation of supervised release. We answer both questions in the affirmative.
Facts and Procedural…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- In re CaldwellOhio Supreme Court · 1996
3Cited by31 opinions
- State v. HeidOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. McDougaldOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- In re B.P.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. RichterOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- In re J.C.E.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.