Legal Opinion
In re Anderson
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided June 13, 2001No. 00-906PublishedCited by 79 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.
In August and September 1997, two complaints were filed in the Clark County Juvenile Court against appellant, Charles M. Anderson. The complaints alleged that appellant was delinquent by reason of having committed rape, R.C. 2907.02, a first-degree felony, and gross sexual imposition, R.C. 2907.05, a third-degree felony. The rape charge was later amended to gross sexual imposition.
Appellant admitted both charges. On December 17, 1997, the juvenile court adjudicated appellant a delinquent and ordered him committed to the Ohio Department of Youth Services (“DYS”) for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Schall v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. HanningOhio Supreme Court · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- State v. WallsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. IaconaOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. WallsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- In re A.J.S.Ohio Supreme Court · 2008
- In re C.S.Ohio Supreme Court · 2007
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.