Nervick v. Fine
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWalsh, J.
Defendant moves pursuant to rule 107 of the Buies of Civil Practice for judgment dismissing the complaint upon the ground that the cause of action sét forth therein did not accrue within the time limited by law (Civ. Prac. Act, § 50) for the commencement of an action thereon.
The defendant, a physician, is sued for his alleged malpractice in the treatment of the plaintiff. The defendant in his answer, as an affirmative defense, alleges that the action is barred by the Statute of Limitations.
The undisputed facts briefly are as follows; Plaintiff, suffering from an ear ailment, retained and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Conklin v. DraperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- Conklin v. DraperNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Sly v. Van LengenNew York Supreme Court · 1923
3Cited by10 opinions
- Connell v. HaydenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Barrella v. Richmond Memorial HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Watkins v. FrommAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Hammer v. RosenNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
- Paciello v. PatelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.