Legal Opinion
Paciello v. Patel
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 19, 1981PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Damiani, J.
This is an action against four doctors to recover damages for medical malpractice based, in substance, upon the allegation that they negligently failed to diagnose a cancer with which the plaintiff Nancy Paciello was afflicted. Paragraph “twenty-second” of the complaint alleged that all the defendants were partners. The defendants Patel, *74Pearlman and Silver served a joint answer which, inter alia, denied that all four of the defendants were partners but expressly admitted that “the defendants Patel, Pearl-man and Silver were partners at all times relevant to the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Borgia v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
- Connell v. HaydenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Davis v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Nervick v. FineNew York Supreme Court · 1949
3Cited by6 opinions
- Manufactures & Traders Trust Co. v. LindauerNew York Supreme Court · 1987
- Patten v. Hamburg OB/GYN Group, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Scialo v. GassAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Kladek v. St. Vincent's Hospital & Medical CenterNew York Supreme Court · 1985
- Chaisson v. North Shore University HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.