Watkins v. Fromm
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Niehoff, J.
This appeal presents the novel question of whether a patient of a medical group, who allegedly has suffered injury by reason *234of the malpractice of doctors associated with the group, is entitled to the benefit of the “continuous treatment” doctrine as against the doctors alleged to have committed the acts of malpractice where the patient continues to receive treatment for the same illness, injury or condition from other members of the group following the departure from the group of the alleged wrongdoing doctors.
Defendants Fromm and Sarno, the physicians who left…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- McDermott v. TorreNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Borgia v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
- Greene v. GreeneNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Davis v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Siegel v. KranisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Grey v. Stamford Health System, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Pierre-Louis v. Ching-Yuan HwaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Grellet v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Harrison v. ValentiniKentucky Supreme Court · 2006
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.