Legal Opinion

Pitts v. Gangi

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 13, 2004No. 1031081PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harold D. Pitts appeals from an order of the Cullman Circuit Court requiring him to pay Donna Gangi $67,318.43, plus other lawful charges for improvements and taxes, in order to redeem his property. We affirm.

On October 14, 1999, Pitts gave a mortgage on real property he owned to Phoenix Funding; Phoenix Funding assigned that mortgage to Bank One National Association ("Bank One").1 Bank One foreclosed on Pitts's property and on May 22, 2001, held a foreclosure sale. At the sale, Bank One bid the amount of debt owed on the mortgage: $382,318.43. Bank One also secured insurance on the property.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. IMED Corp. v. Systems Engineering Assoc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. NielsenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  3. DeKalb County LP Gas Co., Inc. v. Suburban Gas, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  4. Greene v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  5. Estes v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Exxon Mobil Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  2. Chism v. Jefferson CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  3. Ankrom v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
  4. Boone v. Birmingham Board of EducationSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  5. ARCHER EX REL. ARCHER v. Estate of ArcherSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API