Legal Opinion

Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. Nielsen

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 17, 1998No. 1961757PublishedCited by 205 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has certified to this Court questions regarding the interpretation of Alabama laws regulating companies that offer health care benefits and regarding whether certain laws designed to protect a patient's right to select his or her doctor, dentist, or pharmacist apply to a company like Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc. ("Blue Cross"), which is organized under the provisions of a specific state statute. The specific questions certified are as follows:

"Is Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama exempted by § 10-4-115 and §…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. IMED Corp. v. Systems Engineering Assoc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Ex Parte HolladaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  3. Tayloe v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  4. Ex Parte Louisville & NR Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981

3Cited by205 opinions

  1. Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. HodurskiSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  2. DeKalb County LP Gas Co., Inc. v. Suburban Gas, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  3. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. MotleySupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  4. Ex Parte Pfizer, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  5. Ex Parte PrattSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001

200 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API