Legal Opinion

Boone v. Birmingham Board of Education

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 6, 2009No. 1071539PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Justice.

The petitioner, the Birmingham Board of Education (“the BOE”), asks us to review the decision of the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals holding that appointments to nonteaching supplemental positions made by the BOE are subject to the notification requirements of the Teacher Tenure Act, § 16-24-1 et seq., Ala.Code 1975 (“the TTA”), for nonrenewal when the appointee is a “teacher” as that term is defined in the TTA. The BOE argues that the Court of Civil Appeals has improperly extended the reach of the TTA and that that court’s opinion conflicts with existing precedent. We agree,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. DeKalb County LP Gas Co., Inc. v. Suburban Gas, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  2. WATER WORKS AND SEWER BOARD OF SELMA v. RandolphSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  3. EMP. RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF ALA. v. HeadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  4. Ex Parte Exxon Mobil Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  5. Siegelman v. Chase Manhattan BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. First Union Natl. Bank v. Lee Cty. Comm., 1090804 (Ala. 6-30-2011)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011
  2. T-Mobile v. Bonet, 1100107 (Ala. 12-2-2011)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011
  3. Elliott v. Navistar, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  4. ARCHER EX REL. ARCHER v. Estate of ArcherSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  5. Cockrell v. PruittSupreme Court of Alabama · 2016

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API