Legal Opinion
Ankrom v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided January 11, 2013No. 1110176 and 1110219PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Justice.
Hope Elisabeth Ankrom and Amanda Helaine Borden Kimbrough (“the petition*401ers”) each petitioned this Court for a writ of certiorari to review the Court of Criminal Appeals’ decisions in their cases. We granted the petitions and consolidated these cases, each of which presents the same issue of first impression for this Court’s consideration: Whether the term “child” as used in § 26-15-3.2, Ala.Code 1975 (“the chemical-endangerment statute”), includes an unborn child. Concluding that it does and that the Court of Criminal Appeals reached the correct decision in both cases, we…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. LTV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- IMED Corp. v. Systems Engineering Assoc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Autauga Quality Cotton Association v. Tim L. CrosbyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
- Pruitt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2018
- Hicks v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2014
- Bargsley v. Authority (In re Birmingham Airport Auth.)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2018
- Bargsley v. Authority (In re Birmingham Airport Auth.)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2018
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.