Legal Opinion

Pauley v. Hadlock

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1920No. Civil No. 1744PublishedCited by 13 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Maricopa. F. H. Lyman, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

Appellant, Pauley, instituted this action to compel appellee, Hadlock, to specifically perform an optional contract of sale of forty acres of land situate near Mesa, Maricopa county, Arizona. On August 27, 1917, appellee entered into a written lease of the land to appellant for one year, dating from *342October 1st, for a rental consideration of $800, payable in monthly payments of $66.65, and agreed therein that appellant might purchase the premises on or before October 1, 1918, for $8,500. Appellant took possession, paid the agreed rent, and on October 1, 1918, tendered the appellee $8,500 and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Willard v. TayloeSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Tourette v. TouretteArizona Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Morgan v. BellWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Phelan v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Webb v. StillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Shreeve v. GreerArizona Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Schneidau v. ManleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
  3. Greer v. GoeslingArizona Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Schock v. JackaArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Varnes v. WhiteArizona Supreme Court · 1932

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API