Legal Opinion

Webb v. Still

California Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1897No. S. F. No. 650PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal from a decree of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco setting apart a homestead. J. V. Coffey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Searls, C.

This is an appeal from an order of the probate court in and for the city and county of San Francisco, setting apart to Samuel W. Still, the infant son of Alden P. Still and Grace U. Still, his wife, as a homestead a lot of land, with the dwelling-house thereon, situated on Twenty-fourth street, city and county of San Francisco, of the value of say two thousand dollars.

It appears from the bill of exceptions that Alden P. Still died intestate at the city and county of San Francisco June 30, 1885, leaving him surviving Grace U. Still, his widow, and three minor children, viz., John P.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In re Estate of BallentineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  2. In re Estate of MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Phelan v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. In re the Estate of BolandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  5. In re the Estate of LahiffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Estate of PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Estate of BlairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Gosnell v. GosnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Varnes v. WhiteArizona Supreme Court · 1932
  5. In re Hansen's EstateUtah Supreme Court · 1919

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API