Legal Opinion
Schneidau v. Manley
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 26, 1944PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
The plaintiff brought this action against the defendants, husband and wife, for specific performance and damages because of their failure to carry out an alleged contract to sell realty owned by them in Norwalk. The complaint alleged that the defendants owned the land, which was located in the Silvermine district of Norwalk; that the defendant William F. Manley, to whom we shall hereafter refer as Manley, was the husband and agent of the defendant Armenell F. Manley; that on March 29, 1943, he accepted by telegram the plaintiff's written offer of $8500 net for the premises; and that the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Willard v. TayloeSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Nichols v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1834
- Shelinsky v. FosterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
- St. John v. Erie Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Melin v. WoolleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Kakalik v. BernardoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Botticello v. StefanoviczSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Heyman v. CBS, INC.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Beach v. BeachSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Allen v. NissleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.