Legal Opinion

Foster v. Cimarron Valley Bank of Coyle

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 4, 1904PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from the Prolate Court of Logan County; before C. W. Goodrich, Trial Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Pancoast, J.:

This was an action commenced in the probate court of Logan county by the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error, to recover an alleged balance of $183.45, due upon two promissory notes 'given by the plaintiff in error to the defendant, in error.

A summons was issued, directed to the sheriff of Dewey county, which was served on the defendant there. No other service was obtained.

At the commencement of the action, the defendant in error caused an attachment to be issued 'against the property of the plaintiff in error, alleging in the affidavit, among other grounds, “That…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rullman v. HulseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
  2. Rullman v. HulseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  3. Linney v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nicoll Et Ux. v. Midland Savings Loan Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. First Nat. Bank of Seminole v. HenshawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. Pine v. Superior Court of Seminole CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Ozark Marble Co. v. StillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  5. Edmondston v. PorterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API