Rullman v. Hulse
Supreme Court of Kansas
Motion for Rehearing. In Rullman v. Hulse, 32 Kas. 598, the judgment of the court below was affirmed. The plaintiff in error filed a motion for a rehearing. This motion the court decided at its session in June, 1885.
1Per curiam
This case was heard and decided by the supreme court at its January term, 1884, and the judgment of the court below was affirmed. (Rullman v. Hulse, 32 Kas. 598.) The plaintiff in error now moves'for a rehearing.
Under the statutes of Kansas an ordinary civil action for the recovery of money can be brought only in the county in which the defendant or some one of the defendants reside or may be summoned. (Civil Code, § 55.) And before a summons can be rightfully issued from one county to another, the persons served with the summons in the county in which the action is brought must have some…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brenner v. EglySupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
- Watson v. JacksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
- Rullman v. HulseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
- Bundrem v. DennSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
- Stone v. BooneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Fisher v. FiskeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Haynes, Admx. v. City Nat. Bank of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Hawkins v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
- Marshall v. Saline River Land & Mineral Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1907
- King v. IngelsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.