Allred v. City of Raleigh
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtGeaham, J.
Plaintiffs’ primary contention is that the evidence conclusively establishes that the ordinance in question is invalid on the grounds that it is inconsistent with the comprehensive zoning plan of the City of Raleigh.
Through the provisions of Article 14 of Chapter 160 of the General Statutes, cities and towns of this State have been delegated the authority to zone property within their boundaries and to restrict to specified purposes the uses of private property within each zone. This authority is limited by the provisions of the enabling statute and also by constitutional provisions which…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Cleaver v. Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Zopfi v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- In Re Appeal of ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Marshall v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1943
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- A-S-P Associates v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Northfield Development Co. v. City of BurlingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Willis v. Union CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Norwood v. VILLAGE OF SUGAR MOUNTAINCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- State Ex Rel. Chiavola v. Village of OakwoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.