People v. D'Acquisto
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER IMPOSING SANCTIONS
I. ISSUE
Disbarment is generally appropriate when a lawyer knowingly converts client property for his own benefit,1 while suspension is appropriate when a lawyer knows or should know he is dealing improperly with client property. Respondent failed to refund or account to one of his clients for $3,500.00 in fees tendered for pre-trial representation and failed to appear for scheduled events on six client matters. Is disbarment the appropriate sanction when there is significant evidence of mitigation?
SANCTION IMPOSED: ATTORNEY SUSPENDED FOR THREE (3) YEARS
II.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re RooseSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
- In Re FischerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- In Re DeRoseSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- People v. LujanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- State Life Insurance v. UsserySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.