Legal Opinion

People v. D'Acquisto

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided August 9, 2006No. 05PDJ075Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER IMPOSING SANCTIONS

I. ISSUE

Disbarment is generally appropriate when a lawyer knowingly converts client property for his own benefit,1 while suspension is appropriate when a lawyer knows or should know he is dealing improperly with client property. Respondent failed to refund or account to one of his clients for $3,500.00 in fees tendered for pre-trial representation and failed to appear for scheduled events on six client matters. Is disbarment the appropriate sanction when there is significant evidence of mitigation?

SANCTION IMPOSED: ATTORNEY SUSPENDED FOR THREE (3) YEARS

II.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re RooseSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  2. In Re FischerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  3. In Re DeRoseSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  4. People v. LujanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  5. State Life Insurance v. UsserySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API