Legal Opinion

C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 15, 1972No. C.R.D. 72-11PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Maletz, Judge:

This case — which comes before the court on cross-motions for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to rule 4.9 1— involves the dutiable status of imported merchandise that was described on the invoice as composite powder. The import was classified by the government under item 657.50 of the tariff schedules, as modified by T.D. 68-9, as “[ajrticles of nickel, not coated or plated with precious metal” and assessed with duty at the rate of 16 percent ad valorem.

Plaintiff’s claim is that the importation is more specifically provided for under item 620.82, as modified by T.D. 68-9, as…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Empire Electronics Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  3. Ramsouer v. Midland Valley R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
  4. Brown v. BullockDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
  5. Dyson v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1969

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. Ataka America, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 1993
  2. Forest Laboratories, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
  3. Suwannee Steamship Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
  4. Trans-Border Customs Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994
  5. F. W. Myers & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API