Legal Opinion

Faust v. Parrott

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 8, 1978No. 48074PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TODD, Justice.

Plaintiffs purchased a salvage business from defendants and received, in addition to the business assets and goodwill, the defendants’ contractual promise not to compete in the salvage business within a 100-mile radius of the plaintiffs’ operation. Plaintiffs brought this action, alleging a breach of that covenant. The jury returned a verdict in plaintiffs’ favor, and defendants appeal, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence and the proof of damages. We affirm the jury’s verdict on the question of liability, vacate the damage award, and remand the case for a new trial on…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Northern Petrochemical Co. v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  2. Bess v. BothmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Don Kral Incorporated v. LindstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  4. Naftalin v. John Wood CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  5. Hansen v. HansenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto's, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. UnitedHealth Group Inc. v. Executive Risk Specialty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
  3. Cardinal Consulting Co. v. Circo Resorts, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Zobel & Dahl Construction v. CrottySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Hinz v. Neuroscience, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API