Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Horne v. Autozone, Inc.
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided May 15, 2012No. CV-11-0291-PRPublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HURWITZ, Vice Chief Justice.
¶ 1 We are asked in this case to interpret the Arizona Consumer Fraud Act (“CFA”), AR.S. §§ 44-1521 to -1534.
I
¶2 In 2001, the Arizona Department of Weights and Measures began investigating AutoZone, Inc., an automobile parts and accessories retailer. The investigation concerned AutoZone’s compliance with A.R.S. § 41-2081 (the “Pricing Act”), which prohibits mispricing and requires a seller to display prices on merchandise or at the point of display. As a result of this investigation, the Department fined AutoZone for violating the Pricing Act several times…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial HospitalArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Pantron I Corporation, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Fenwick v. Kay American Jeep, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- Randle v. Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1910
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Graphic Communications Local 1B Health & Welfare Fund "A" v. CVS Caremark Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Cheatham v. ADT Corp.District Court, D. Arizona · 2016
- Dennis Speerly v. General Motors, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025
- James C. Sell v. Hon. gama/squire & CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 2013
- In re Arizona Theranos, Inc., LitigationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2017
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.