Legal Opinion
Cheatham v. ADT Corp.
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided February 11, 2016No. CV-15-02137-PHX-DGCPublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
David G. Campbell, United States District Judge
On September 9, 2015, Plaintiff Janet Cheatham initiated this action by filing a class action complaint against Defendants ADT Corporation (“ADT Corp.”) and ADT LLC in the Maricopa County Superior Court. Doc. 1-1 at 9-33. The complaint asserts claims against ADT LLC for consumer fraud and unjust enrichment, and claims against ADT Corp. for consumer fraud, unjust enrichment, and strict products liability. Id.
On October 23, 2015, Defendants removed the action to this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a), asserting federal jurisdiction under…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Data Disc, Incorporated v. Systems Technology Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Cousins v. LockyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Schechner v. Whirlpool Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2017
- In re Gen. Motors LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Mills-Williams v. MappSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2017
- In re Arizona Theranos, Inc., LitigationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2017
- Gonzalez v. CorningDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.