Legal Opinion

Hoppmann v. Pampered Pets & Plants Incorporated

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided February 1, 2024No. 2:22-cv-00427Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Sandra S Hoppmann, No. CV-22-00427-PHX-DWL 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Pampered Pets & Plants Incorporated, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 INTRODUCTION 16 Sandra Hoppmann (“Hoppmann”) worked for Pampered Pets & Plants Inc. (“PPP”), 17 a company owned by Susan Hall (“Hall”), until resigning in December 2021. Hoppmann 18 then sued PPP and Hall under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), Arizona Minimum 19 Wage Act (“AMWA”), Fair Wages and Healthy Families Act (“FWHFA”), and Arizona 20 Wage Act (“AWA”). In…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. David P. Pagtalunan v. George Galaza, Warden Thomas Maddock, Acting Director, California Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. Hells Canyon Preservation Council v. U.S. Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. Sineneng-SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 2020

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API