Legal Opinion

Chase v. Jonkey

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 11, 1936No. Civ. 9627PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoran, J.

This is an action for damages resulting from an automobile accident which occurred at the intersection of Sunset Boulevard and Van Ness Avenue in Los Angeles. The accident happened in the month of August, about 5 o’clock in the evening. The two streets above mentioned intersect at right angles. Sunset Boulevard is eighty! feet wide and Van Ness Avenue is sixty feet wide. Sunset Boulevard is a main thoroughfare with "stop" signs posted at its entrance from Van Ness Avenue for traffic traveling north and south on Van Ness. ]

Quoting from the reporter’s transcript of the testimony, plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Driscoll v. Market Street Cable RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Houghton v. Loma Prieta Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Smith v. BelshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Austin v. NewtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  5. Hedge v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bramble v. McEwanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  2. Flannery v. KochCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. Reed v. StrohCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Wynne v. WynneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Siegell v. YorkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API