Legal Opinion
Siegell v. York
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 16, 1948No. Civ. No. 16031PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.
Plaintiff instituted this action to recover damages for the alleged wrongful death of her husband, *385Bennie Siegell, which occurred on July 23, 1945, as the result of a collision between an “Army” jeep operated by the deceased, a member of the armed forces of the United States, and a truck operated by the defendant York and owned by the other defendants.
By her first amended complaint, plaintiff alleged that defendant York was operating the truck as an employee of his codefendants; that he so negligently operated said truck as to cause it to collide with the automobile operated by the deceased,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Juchert v. California Water Service Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
- Fischer v. KeenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Austin v. NewtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Shannon v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Taylor v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kaneko v. OkudaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Douglas v. BergereCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Muir v. GrierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Brown v. Jack & Jeff Transfer Co.California Court of Appeal · 1951