Legal Opinion

Hedge v. Williams

California Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1901No. Sac. No. 724PublishedCited by 23 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

This action was brought by the surviving wife and minor children, for damages occasioned by the death of Joseph A. Hedge, the husband and father. Defendant appeals from the judgment and order denying his motion for a new trial.

The material facts in the case are as follows: Defendant was the owner of a large fruit farm near the town of Porterville. One A. H. Schultz was the superintendent of defendant in the management of the farm. A large tank, used to store distillate, was located upon the premises. Schultz discovered that the tank was leaking, and directed that the distillate be withdrawn…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Callan v. BullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Bennett v. TruebodyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Ahern v. McGearyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ChadwickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Western Indemnity Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Teller v. Bay and River Dredging Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Flickenger v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Marks v. ReissingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API