Legal Opinion

Fausnight v. Perkins

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 23, 2008No. 1060171PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brian Fausnight1 appeals from a partial summary judgment entered by the Elmore Circuit Court in favor of Ronald G. Perkins and Naomi Perkins. We reverse.

I. Facts and Procedural History

In 2004, the Perkinses contacted Fausnight about constructing a log house for them on property they owned. After they reached an agreement on building the house, Fausnight purchased a building permit from the Town of Eclectic and began work on the house. Fausnight was not licensed to build houses, as required by Ala. Code 1975, § 34-14A-5. The Perkinses paid Fausnight $195,359.83 for the construction of the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Schank v. . SchuchmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Citaramanis v. HallowellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  3. Mascarenas v. JaramilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Turner v. Westhampton Court, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  5. Comet Theatre Enterprises, Inc. v. CartwrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cox v. LaycockUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Hollinger v. WellsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  3. Crews v. McLINGSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  4. Milloy v. H.H. Woods & Woods & Sons ConstructionCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009
  5. Hutchenson v. DanielCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API