Legal Opinion

Adams v. Peoples

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1985No. Nos. 84-917 and 84-919PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClifford F. Brown, J.

“In the absence of a statute providing immunity, the defense of sovereign immunity is not available to a municipal corporation * * Strohofer v. Cincinnati (1983), 6 Ohio St. 3d 118, syllabus. See, also, Haverlack v. Portage Homes, Inc. (1982), 2 Ohio St. 3d 26; Enghauser Mfg. Co. v. Eriksson Engineering Ltd. (1983), 6 Ohio St. 3d 31; and Longfellow v. Newark (1985), 18 Ohio St. 3d 144. In the present case the court is called upon to interpret the immunity provided a municipal corporation by R.C. 701.02. This is not the first case in which this court has been presented with this question since…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Haverlack v. Portage Homes, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Enghauser Manufacturing Co. v. Eriksson Engineering Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Strohofer v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. King v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Longfellow v. City of NewarkOhio Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  2. Burr v. Board of County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State ex rel. Sawicki v. Court of Common Pleas of Lucas Cty.Ohio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Reynolds v. City of OakwoodOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Clawson v. Hts. Chiropractic Physicians, L.L.C.Ohio Supreme Court · 2022

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API