Legal Opinion

Gardner v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 26, 1998No. CR 97-785PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Annabelle Clinton Imber, Justice.

This case presents a question concerning the law of prosecutorial vindictiveness. The appellant purported to enter a guilty plea which was subsequently vacated on federal habeas review. On retrial, the appellant was charged as a habitual offender based on prior felony convictions, most of which had occurred prior to the appellant’s initial plea attempt. The trial court denied the appellant’s motion to dismiss the habitual charge based on prosecutorial vindictiveness. We find no error and affirm.

On November 8, 1990, Scotty Ray Gardner was charged with two…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  2. Phavixay v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  3. Elgin King v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2021
  4. Whitlow v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  5. Townsend v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API