Legal Opinion

Hood v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 18, 2006No. PD-0945-04PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · HerveyHervey, J.

in which KELLER, P.J., KEASLER, HOLCOMB and COCHRAN, JJ., joined.

At issue is whether the government violated due-process principles by adding two enhancement paragraphs to appellant’s reindictment after appellant’s conviction on the original indictment was reversed on appeal. We decide that no due-process violation occurred.

Appellant was indicted in November 1994 for aggravated sexual assault of a child under fourteen years of age. This indictment contained no enhancement paragraphs. A jury convicted appellant of the offense charged in this indictment and assessed a sixty-five-year…

3Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by24 opinions

  1. Ex Parte MillerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
  2. Ex Parte Legrand, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
  3. McNatt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  4. Frabon Crocker v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2013
  5. Ortegon v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2008

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API