Hood v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · HerveyHervey, J.
in which KELLER, P.J., KEASLER, HOLCOMB and COCHRAN, JJ., joined.
At issue is whether the government violated due-process principles by adding two enhancement paragraphs to appellant’s reindictment after appellant’s conviction on the original indictment was reversed on appeal. We decide that no due-process violation occurred.
Appellant was indicted in November 1994 for aggravated sexual assault of a child under fourteen years of age. This indictment contained no enhancement paragraphs. A jury convicted appellant of the offense charged in this indictment and assessed a sixty-five-year…
3Cases cited25 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by24 opinions
- Ex Parte MillerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
- Ex Parte Legrand, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
- McNatt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Frabon Crocker v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2013
- Ortegon v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2008
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.