Legal Opinion
Palmisano v. United States Brewing Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 27, 1942No. 2530PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUXMAN, Circuit Judge.
On or about August 9, 1934, in Kansas City, Kansas, Leo Palmisano, Frank Palm-isano and James Palmisano executed a contract with the United States Brewing Company of Chicago, Illinois, in which they agreed to handle and distribute the company’s beer in the territory assigned to them. Apparently at the same time and as a part of the same transaction, a guaranty contract was signed by the three Palmisano brothers and by Mary Palmisano, wife of James Palmisano, in which they guaranteed performance of the distributor’s contract. Beer was distributed under this contract until…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fitzsimons v. Eagle Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
- Yarnold v. City of LawrenceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
- Bowman v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
- Denning v. YountSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
- State ex rel. Wyman v. OwstonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
3Cited by3 opinions
- Coffey v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Gugliotta v. Evans & Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1988
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,844 Florabelle Coffey v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Jeffrey Hines, an Individual v. L. Irving Coffey, Third-Party-DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989