Legal Opinion
United States v. Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided July 19, 1993No. Civ. 3-92-789PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MAGNUSON, District Judge.
This matter is before the court upon defendant National City Bank’s motion to dismiss for lack of standing and lack of subject matter jurisdiction and on defendant Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren’s (Larkin Hoffman) motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and lack of standing. For the following reasons, the court denies National City Bank’s motion and grants Larkin Hoffman’s motion in part and denies Larkin Hoffman’s motion in part.
BACKGROUND 1
The factual background of this suit is complex and confused. This brief description…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. Miami UniversityDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2000
- Steinberg v. Schneider (In Re Schneider)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
- Midland Farms, LLC v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2014
- United States v. Golden Elevator, Inc.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 1994
- Alberto San, Inc. v. Consejo De Titulares Del Condominio San AlbertoDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.