Legal Opinion
Midland Farms, LLC v. United States Department of Agriculture
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided July 23, 2014No. CIV 13-3029-RALPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS DEPEN-DANT NAU COUNTRY INSURANCE, INC.
ROBERTO A. LANGE, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
NAU Country Insurance, Inc. (“NAU”) has filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint filed by Plaintiff Midland Farms, LLC (“Midland”), Doc. 11. Midland’s Complaint has two counts. Doc. 1. Count I seeks judicial review of an agency decision under, among other statutes, the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. § 701 et seq., and names as Defendants for that claim the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”), the Risk Management Agency (“RMA”), and the…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company and Nu-Car Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Joseph Osborn and Pamela Osborn, Individually and as Father and Mother and Guardians Ad Litem of Shawna Osborn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Noble v. Am. Nat'l Prop.United States District Court · 2018
- Baker v. HensonDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2018
- Baker v. PhillipsDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2018
- Baker v. PhillipsDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2018
- HJR Equipment, Inc. v. City of Kansas City MissouriDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2022
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.