Hargett v. Beardsley
Oregon Supreme Court
From Umatilla: Stephen A. Lowell, Judge. Action by J. D. Hargett against James S. Beardsley. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolverton
This is an action for money had and received, and the complaint alleges, in substance, that about February 15, 1896, the plaintiff was indebted to defendant in the sum of $1,500, for which he had given his promissory note and a mortgage'to secure the same, and, being so indebted, plaintiff and defendant entered into a contract whereby defendant undertook and agreed to rent certain premises of a third party, consisting of 370 acres, advance and pay the rent therefor, furnish the necessary grain to seed the same, advance the necessary mohey for harvesting the crop and furnish the necessary…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. HinesIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
- Quincy Coal Co. v. HoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
- Booth v. MoodyOregon Supreme Court · 1896
- Evarts v. StegerOregon Supreme Court · 1874
- Independent Order of Mutual Aid v. PaineIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Iwanicki v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Creecy v. JoyOregon Supreme Court · 1901
- Byers v. FergusonOregon Supreme Court · 1902
- Patterson v. PattersonOregon Supreme Court · 1902
- Lindstrom v. National Life Ins.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.