Legal Opinion

Crystal Dome Oil & Gas Co. v. Savic

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1931No. 5676PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLee, C. J.

—Plaintiff and respondent, Crystal Dome Oil & Gas Company, sued defendant and appellant, Paul G. Savic, seeking to replevin a geological report, of which it claimed to be the owner and which, it alleged, Savic “wrongfully, wilfully, maliciously and unlawfully took possession of” and “wrongfully, wilfully, maliciously and unlawfully” continued to withhold and retain, to plaintiff’s damage in the sum of $10,000. The value of the report was declared to be $3,085. Defendant and appellant denied “each and every allegation in plaintiff’s complaint contained.” Verdict was rendered in respondent’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Unfried v. LibertIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Chaffin v. . Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  3. Boomer v. IsleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Duggan v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  5. Joyce Bros. v. StanfieldIdaho Supreme Court · 1920

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hatfield v. Max Rouse & Sons NorthwestIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Haskins v. SheldenAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Cox v. StolworthyIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Pittman v. SatherIdaho Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Fauver v. WilkoskeMontana Supreme Court · 1949

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API