Legal Opinion

Trenton v. Scott Paper Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided November 9, 1987No. 87-1176PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*808OPINION OF THE COURT

SEITZ, Circuit Judge.

I.JURISDICTION AND SCOPE OF REVIEW

Appellants appeal from the order of the district court granting appellees’ motion for summary judgment and denying appellants’ motion for summary judgment.

The district court had jurisdiction under 29 U.S.C. §§ 216, 1132(e)-(f), 1303, 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (1982), and the doctrine of pendent jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1982).

The scope of our review is plenary when reviewing grants of summary judgment. Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co., 534 F.2d 566, 573 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1038,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  5. Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Transport Workers UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Hozier v. Midwest Fasteners, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  2. Hlinka v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  3. Haberern v. Kaupp Vascular Surgeons Ltd. Defined Benefit Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  4. Nazay v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  5. Berlin v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API