Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Lohman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1881No. 7672PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Jefferson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Newcomb, C.

Lohman sued John Pattie, John A. Pattie and Thomas E. Smith, formerly partners as Pattie, Smith & Co., and the appellant, upon a promissory note, on which Pattie, Smith & Co. were the principals and the appellant was surety. The makers were defaulted. Taylor answered, and the issues raised by his pleadings were submitted to the court for trial, which found for the plaintiff. Taylor moved for a new trial, and for cause alleged that the finding was contrary to law ; that it was contrary to the evidence, and that it was not supported by the evidence. The motion was overruled, and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Roe v. CronkhiteIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Roberts v. MilesMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Thornburgh v. MadrenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  4. Jamieson v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Whitaker v. KirbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1875

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Asc Corporation v. First Nat. Bank, Etc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Fassnacht v. Emsing Gagen Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. Spurgeon v. SmithaIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Brandt v. HallIndiana Court of Appeals · 1907
  5. JONES v. First Nat. Bank, Adm.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API