Roberts v. Miles
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal in chancery from St. Clair Circuit. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Campbell J.:
The bill in this case was filed to restrain the sale of property under execution.
Defendants hold a judgment against complainant as indorser, he being sued jointly with Mark T. Bailey the maker of a promissory note indorsed for Bailey’s aecom*301modation, and the judgment being against both, and rendered July 6, 1859.
The facts show that when the note was indorsed, Roberts, who was an illiterate man, was assured by Miles (the partner in a bank consisting of all the defendants) that the indorsement was a mere form, and that complainant should never receive any trouble about it. No…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Darling v. HurstMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Brigham v. FawcettMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Newlove v. CallaghanMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Flynn v. ByrneSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1954
- Webber v. JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.