Roe v. Cronkhite
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Warren Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.
The appellees, as plaintiffs, sued the appellant, as defendant, in the court below. Appellees’ complaint was in two paragraphs. The first paragraph counted upon a promissory note, executed by appellant to appellees’ intestate, and alleged to remain unpaid. The second paragraph of the complaint alleged an indebtedness by the appellant to the estate of appellees’ decedent, for goods purchased by appellant from said decedent, in his lifetime, a hill of particulars of which was filed with and made part of said paragraph, and that said indebtedness was due and unpaid.
*184' To this complaint, the…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Schmittler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
- Egbert v. EgbertIndiana Supreme Court · 1948
- Lake Erie & Western Railway Co. v. JudayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
- Norwood v. HarnessIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Riley v. BoyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.