Legal Opinion

Fassnacht v. Emsing Gagen Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 3, 1897No. 1,873PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From the Tippecanoe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Black, J. —

This- was an action upon a promissory note for $219.10, with interest and attorney’s fee, brought by the appellee, the payee, against the appellant, the maker.

There was an answer in five paragraphs. The first paragraph was a general denial. . The second was a plea of want of consideration. The third alleged that the appellant signed the note as surety for her son, Henry Fassnacht, and that for all of the note over $176.00 there was no consideration. In the fourth, the appellant alleged, that she did not execute the note. In the fifth, she alleges that her signature to the note was…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FalveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Union Mutual Life Insurance v. BuchananIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Story v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Home Insurance Co. of New York v. MarpleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. Franklin Bank v. CooperSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1853

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Indianapolis Street Railway Co. v. TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Kaas v. PrivetteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  3. Goodwin v. Abilene State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. Grow v. Indiana Retired Teachers CommunityIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Chrysler Corporation v. The Hanover Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API