Legal Opinion

United States v. Gebhart

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided February 25, 1991No. ACMR 9001471PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

VARO, Judge:

The appellant was tried by a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members. Contrary to his pleas, he was convicted of two specifications of robbery and one specification of assault in violation of Articles 122 and 128, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 922 and 928 (1982). His sentence provided for a bad-conduct discharge and forfeiture of all pay and allowances. Because no confinement had been adjudged, the convening authority approved only so much of the sentence as provides for a bad-conduct discharge, and forfeitures of $482.80…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. RyanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
  2. United States v. HarnishUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
  3. United States v. NeeleyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1985
  4. United States v. HancockU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1979
  5. United States v. BowenU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. GebhartUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  2. United States v. GarmanArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2003
  3. United States v. RokeyUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
  4. United States v. FosterU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1994
  5. United States v. FosterU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API