United States v. Foster
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
CREAN, Senior Judge:
In accordance with his pleas, the appellant was found guilty, by a military judge sitting as a general court-martial, of willful damage to government property and arson, in violation of Articles 108 and 126, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 908 and 926 (1988) [hereinafter UCMJ]. He was sentenced to a dishonorable discharge, confinement for four years, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to Private El. Pursuant to a pretrial agreement and in the exercise of his clemency powers, the convening authority approved only so much…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. HarrisU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. HawkinsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992
- United States v. HancockU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1979
- United States v. BowenU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1989
- United States v. GarnerU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. JonesUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
- United States v. FosterU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1994
- United States v. WilliamsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1994