Owens v. Haslett
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment denying any relief to Rose Haslett, cross-complainant. Plaintiff below, Floyd L. Owens, to whom likewise all relief was denied, but who does not appeal, contracted with defendant Rose Haslett for the building of a dwelling house, for a price of $6,400. It was agreed that payments would be made, one-third when the subfloor was laid, one-third when the roof was on, and the balance when the building was completed. It appears that one Mary DeMartini owned the land on which the house was to be built, but further mention of her as a party is unnecessary since she…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Loving & Evans v. BlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- McAllister v. DrapeauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Holm v. BramwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Teachout v. BogyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Haruko Takeuchi v. SchmuckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- MW Erectors, Inc. v. Niederhauser Ornamental & Metal Works Co.California Supreme Court · 2005
- Grant v. WeatherholtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Vitek, Inc. v. Alvarado Ice Palace, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1973
- City Lincoln-Mercury Co. v. LindseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.