Legal Opinion
Voight & McMakin Air Conditioning, Inc. v. Property Redevelopment Corp.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 15, 1971No. 5565PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAIR, Associate Judge:
Appellant, contractor with the appellee for the installation of certain air conditioning equipment, sued to recover $2,527, allegedly representing the balance due on the contract price of $44,000 as increased by a first agreed upon “extra” in the amount of $5,865 and a second agreed upon “extra” in the amount of $505. Appellee admitted the existence of the contract, but denied that the contract price was as alleged and denied that any “extras” had been agreed upon. After trial of the issues, the court found for the appellee holding that:
* * * [T]he [appellee] owed…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Fire Ins. Assn., Ltd. v. WickhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Spargnapani v. WrightDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954
- Drazin v. Jack Pry, IncorporatedDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1959
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Cole v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Pierola v. MoschonasDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Edwards v. WoodsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Rustler's Steak House v. Environmental Associates, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
- Dulles v. DullesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.