Legal Opinion
Spargnapani v. Wright
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 16, 1954No. 1568PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAYTON, Chief Judge.
Mr. and Mrs. Spargnapani bought a house from Sarsfield through the brokerage office of Wright. After taking possession they discovered that the heating plant was defective and unusable, and after unsuccessful demands for payment of repair costs sued the seller and the broker. Plaintiffs’ testimony was that the broker’s saleswoman had represented that the heating system was in good condition, that the oil btfrner was practically new and that so long as they kept oil in the tank they would have plenty of heat. The negotiations commenced in July or August, and the contract of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- McAllister v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- United States v. Oregon State Medical SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Orvis v. HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Gross v. Sussex Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Howard v. Riggs National BankDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Dresser v. Sunderland Apartments Tenants Ass'nDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Remeikis v. Boss & Phelps, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Bevins v. BallardAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.