Legal Opinion

Drazin v. Jack Pry, Incorporated

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 1, 1959No. 2391PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

QUINN, Associate Judge.

The principal contention on this appeal is that the trial court committed error in its findings. The court found, among other things, that defendant-appellee’s manager acted without either actual or apparent authority when he signed a lease of certain premises, thereby relieving appellee of obligation under the lease. No argument is made that the manager had actual authority, and because of our disposition of the case the other findings need no discussion.

The main thrust of plaintiff-appellant’s argument is the presence of evidence which indicated that apparent…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Owen Et Ux. v. Commercial Union Fire Ins. Co. Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1954
  2. Hoddeson v. Koos Bros.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  3. Crane v. Postal Telegraph Cable Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1918
  4. Livingston v. FuhrmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1944
  5. Glenn v. KraftCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Sigal Construction Corp. v. StanburyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Feltman v. SarbovDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Makins v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Insurance Management of Washington, Inc. v. Eno & Howard Plumbing Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. McLaughlin v. Fidelity Security Life InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API